Following my early years of life-drawing during which the whole pose was the norm I have tended towards hands and feet, and particularly when they are the part of the pose which is nearest and in the foreground and I can pursue an exaggerated perspective. A parallel feature has been the inclusion of a face profile: the recessed eye, the pronounced cheekbone, the chin, etc. This has often entered into the central area of a composition often as a silhouette within a cave like recess formed by a grouping of hands and feet. During this current virtual program I also have been drawn towards including a portrait from the model. Why? Not at all sure. This does not come from a deliberate and conscious decision to do portraiture. In fact I have never really had an interest in portraiture. Heads, faces, parts of faces enter into a drawing almost by accident. In fact I have held the belief that when a face is included then this will become a main focus of attention and interest by the beholder and the rest of the drawing will take second place. One goes straight to the eyes. And I also have held the belief that it is very difficult to get the face right, particularly aspects of symmetry. So as you will have seen in the past when a face enters a composition then I include only part or half of it: i.e. one eye, half a nose, part of the lips, etc. So these four drawings are part of the process described above.
It is Monday evening May 17th and Andrew is modelling. The poses are: 5x1minute, 3x5minutes, 1x20minutes and 1x45minutes. I am drawing with a 2B graphite pencil in each hand and emphasising at times with a 6B. As usual I am keeping my variables constant, so apart from the graphite two handed approach, the paper is A1 and in portrait format regardless of the pose (when a full length lying pose arrives it is tempting to go landscape, but I resist this as it also encourages me to not do the whole pose but to bring parts together and overlap and superimpose which is what I really love to do).
So on to the drawings:
Only one note to add to the drawings and it is an explanation about the first one, which contains five selected parts of the first set of 5x1minute poses. In the one minute I look at the pose, select what to respond to, then outline it, and then add a few points of weightier marks of emphasis. No time for any real conscious engagement with issues of composition, does it look right, mark-making, etc. Then on to the next selection. Many of the lines are exploratory and therefore can be quite light and hardly visible when photographed. So I did something I very, very rarely do and that is to visit a drawing at a later time and do something with it. You see I have this conviction that a drawing is sacred to the moment of its creation, the moment of its making, and that everything which appears on the paper comes from my perceptual processes and from the intimate and complex two-way dialogue between artist and muse. As soon as the pose ends then the process and dialogue stops. And if one returns to a drawing what is one doing? (this is a subject for another time, but one I have often thought about).
So here is a rare exception to the above. I have with a 4B graphite pencil gone over every line, however slight, and brought them all up to the same weight and degree of emphasis. I have done this only once before, a few weeks ago, and maybe there is a future in it. But at the moment I have it on my easel and take a look at it every so often, in the expectation I may be able to identify and articulate the value of this process.








