I had not anticipated anything different to that which usually happens to me at Paul Fowler's 'Extreme Poses' over in Stroud, as I drove over the old Severn Bridge and made my way at a gentle 60 mph up the M5 and then into Stroud. I know that on each visit some aspect of my life-drawing will emerge which we have not seen before. But only occasionally do we witness a radical change. Any change or development is evolutionary but more importantly imperceptible to the eye of most beholders. But thankfully Paul himself will see any change and will help me to be a witness to it and to understand it.
Perhaps today we are seeing something special. Certainly, we have 5 very different responses to each other. Five different 30 minute responses. My state of mind was special: free, relaxed, open, not challenged. This I strongly feel is an outcome of two celebrations which have taken place over the past few days. Firstly, my 80th birthday was celebrated with fifty guests and a hogroast on my hillfort in glorious sunshine. Secondly a group of school friends who entered Chipping Campden Grammar School in north Gloucestershire in 1953 and left it in 1960, and who have been meeting annually for the past ten or so years got together for a weekend to also celebrate their 80th birthdays. The outcome of these two events, and particularly as I enter my ninth decade, is a period of reflection and perhaps a look at what is important in life [add to this moment the changes which have taken place thro' events of the past two and a half years in which Covid isolation and withdrawal has generated a different way of life and a different way of thinking]. I believe I am now starting to re-orientate my life and to focus on the essentials. One of these essentials is my life-drawing. This will continue and so will grow.
So what happened in my drawing this morning? Let me start with an additional, and for me an unplanned bonus, which was when the model entered the studio: it was Shelley. Paul knows how fully I respond to her poses. And this morning she inspired. She always does. Shelley projects herself. She initiates the dialogue. All I have to do is just to start drawing.
Straight into, what is for me, a fairly conventional response. The underside of the right foot was directly in front of me less than a metre away. Close by, the toes of the other foot peeped from behind a strap. The enticing forms of her buttocks appeared across the paper, superimposed upon the feet but with simpler singular lines and introduced at a different scale. I then noticed the hands clasping a strap and I recall I felt they should enter the composition in a cluster with the feet.

Paul felt this was the most sensitive of this morning's responses. He said this could be no other model than Shelley. He said that this is you, drawing Shelley, 'cause you respond to Shelley. There are three parts of the pose I have elected to draw. This is not what I decided at the start. Far from it. My process, usually now, is that I go straight for the part of the pose which I first see and am attracted to. Here it is the large shape of the thigh, together with the knee and calf, and then the curves of the bottom with the supporting straps. The foot that came towards me then went in, but I selected this 'cause I loved the way the toes extended over the edge of the supporting plinth. The same line of the edge of the plinth went in at a lower level, and at the last moment, to make sense of how the bottom was being supported by straps and therefor hovering over the plinth. Whilst all this was taking place I knew I would be including the breast, and me looking upwards, up the side of the face. So in this went with the accompanying shoulder and arm. This was a carefree and risky addition to the composition, but I believe that I had every confidence that it would work. So what we are now looking at is my selection of the essential anatomical characteristic parts of the pose, put together to create my own form, and which I presume says something about my perceptual responses to the pose and the model before me.

The 3rd pose before coffee break. Right before my eyes I witnessed a form so beautiful, that I instantly knew I must not deconstruct it. I must not violate it's beauty. I have to approach this drawing differently. My regular tool, I immediately knew was not appropriate. The classic vertical structural path of chin supported by hand, the elbow on the knee, the weight down the leg on to the plinth, had to be captured. The angles of the legs and the continued triangulations of the arm and the slopes of the two shoulders, together with the advancing feet powerfully coming towards me, all fundamental to the pose, had to be respected. And my tool, yes, had to change. There is sculpture, there is tone, there is a dynamic to the form. So out came the 4B graphite pencils, one in each hand, out came the willow charcoal caressed with the finger, and then to complete my excitement about what was happening with my mark-making I then picked up two fine-liner pens and explored a bit of detail. Graphite pencil, charcoal, fine-liner pen then were used over and over again to explore and emphasise. I believe Shelley was fully aware of what she was presenting me with, I believe she knew I would love it.

Whereas the first three drawings came from within me, and although I have given a description of the process of making the drawings, I firmly believe that what appears on the paper is much more an outcome of a subconscious, intuitive, and meditative process than a considered one. And with this approach I am always interested and at times quite anxious to stand back after the 30 minutes of the pose to see what has appeared on the paper. However with this 4th drawing of the morning we have a much more, what I might describe as, an academic approach. Here I have started with a diagonal of the outline, or profile, of one side of the body. I evaluated this and liked it. I then decided to place alongside this the same profile but seen from moving my easel 2 to 3 feet to the left. I then included the back profile (on the left of the drawing) and then moved my easel back to the original position and drew the first profile but at a different scale and including the knee (at the lower right of the drawing). The result, an overall form within which other compositions take place. I am also conscious of a play of breasts, and a play of repeats of the groin area. So it is a serious drawing with some dancing parts.

I immediately went for the chin supported on the hand. Then, as I was attracted by the hanging breast down on to the folds of the tummy, I was reminded of my exhibition drawing [Paul the gardener holding his head in his hand which then morphed with a foot on the edge of a plinth] so I morphed the hand with the breast. I recall I wanted to stop there. But only 10 minutes of the 30 minutes of the pose had elapsed. Should I start a new drawing? No! Let's gamble, and continue, and see what happens. I had a feeling I would like to include the profile of the back in order to create an overall form and composition on the paper, but elected to next include that part of the pose related to the right of the breast and tummy, i.e. the thigh and arm. Then it was obvious to me how to include the curve of the profile of the back leading down to the bottom sitting on the plinth. I quite like to include the straight geometries of the plinth as a contrast to the organic forms of the body. But also, of course, the inclusion of the plinth is just as essential as the inclusion of straps to explain the pose (sometimes). So the essence of this drawing is 'morphism' and 'different scales'.