My previous posting introduced my looking forward to my 3 days over at Niel Bally's studio in Talgarth. I was not let down nor did I disappoint myself.
Niel attracts amazing people. Each reveals their own identity in their individual and provocative responses via a diversity of media. This context helps me to focus on what it is that is particular about my own art, my own process, my own way of seeing.
His studio has an ambiance of light, shared experience and communal endeavor which provokes creative responses to the poses which are each considered and discussed by everyone. Niel himself provides a continuous and exhaustive context of references to examples of the past masters of the art of responding to the human body with displays of images on the walls of his studio and access to a wealth of books on relevant artists:

There was an added bonus! Our model for all three days is Kate. I have had the privilege of drawing Kate over a number of years, and in different venues. With time, a dialogue between artist and model is established. This is a two-way connection. We talk of our shared interests not only in vegetable growing, in permaculture, and in other subjects, but also in the complexities, opportunities, enjoyments when in the life-drawing studio. So, I know Kate, I can look beyond my initial gaze, I am able to connect with her, a dialogue is already established and in place which I can easily latch in to, and freely start, unconstrained to make marks on my paper.
This morning I photographed my drawings and here they are. Lots to say about them, but I will need time in order to descend from the heights of my post-drawing feelings and give a considered self-critical response (So. Watch this space!).
The drawings are posted more or less in sequence in the order they were made.
-----------------------------------------------
I am now back and will go through each drawing and start writing my thoughts on them.................
Day ONE:
We started off with a number of standing poses of about 5 minutes each. I am deliberately touching the paper lightly with a fine-liner pen in each hand, and not revisiting a line. So what you see is my first touch and first exploratory response. Made the decision to include more than one pose on each A1 paper.
Then Kate reclined in front of a long horizontal mirror:
I can't really recall when this next drawing happened so it may be out of sequence. I was clearly attracted to the advancing foot. But which of the rest is a reflection in the mirror I am unable to say.
Kate then took up a seated pose, and you can see her reflection, and I had fun engaging with arms, legs, hands and feet.
Then back to Kate lying in front of the mirror. I regularly enjoy the challenge of engaging with a long horizontal pose (from left to right) and how to explore this and include it on an A1 portrait format. The pose has to be compressed in someway. Head and shoulders are brought in from the right, and the lower parts of the pose are brought in from the left, and the two overlap and are morphed together. This was the last drawing of the day and I just felt like a change from my purist line drawing approach, so out came the charcoal, and some very speedy graphite pencil hatching.
Day TWO:
Started with one of my usual deconstruction/re-construction games.
Then another mirror reflection drawing.
And again the use of the mirror, with Kate at 90 degrees to the mirror and her head towards me. One can get quite confused when bringing together the main pose with its reflection. Here the lower part of her left leg is a continuation from her left thigh. However, in my confused state I have introduced a bizarre spatial anomaly. It appears that the reflected body in the mirror is projecting its leg towards us. Quite bizarre. Something of a Magritte moment.
There are a number of reflections mixed up with direct images in this more complex construction, all drawn at different scales. So a continuation of recent aspects: overlap, transparency, superimpositioning, morphing, varying scales, spatiality, etc., plus weight of upper body supported by hand on plinth, plus advancing foot with toes to the fore.
And this, I really enjoyed standing back and viewing what I had created. A sort of landscape. A slow drawing, carefully compiled, lines and tonal work considered.
Day THREE:
My drawings from the first two days have their similarities and parallels in my past work. Nothing new really. So it would seem that the advantage (to me) of a third day is that I felt a need to do something different, and perhaps experiment a bit.
In this first drawing of day three I elected to draw the feet and their reflections with fine-liner pens (down the right hand side of the composition) and to contrast this with graphite pencil and charcoal in my exploration of the main body of the pose and its reflection. So two mark-making media in the one drawing. Kate's feet were each resting on a rectangular cushion, and the reflection of these in the mirror set up an interesting series of planes at varying angles.
Echoes of Matisse, Picasso and Jenny Saville as the pose was explored with charcoal, then rubbed back, then explored again, and again rubbed back, and gradually the various parts of her anatomy moved back and forth until their eventual and acceptable location was found. I guess this process could have been repeated a few more times until a final refined outcome is achieved.
The last drawing of day two (the landscape) and this next one stand out for me as the highlights of the three days. So, why this one?
To start with (as others remarked) the face is Kate!
Then I have brought closer together the two halves of the figure.
Then each half is treated differently.
Her right side is drawn using graphite pencil and charcoal, whilst her left side uses fine-liner pens.
I bring up her right leg, from toes to her groin, and superimpose it upon her upper body.
The whole is fairly carefully considered.
The outcome is NOT a product of a fairly speedy exploratory, emotive and intuitive and 'meditative' process.
We were getting to the end of day three. About 30 minutes remaining. Kate adjusted her chair position through 90 degrees. I was now viewing her side on. She was sort of resting against the mirror. A 2H graphite pencil in my dominant hand started outlining the form. It grew upwards off the paper. But I wanted to represent the full length and form of the pose. So at a reduced scale I tried again. Even then her knee and left foot could not be included. But whilst doing this smaller version I saw the reflection in the mirror of her hand resting on the arm of the chair. I then returned to the initial figure and put in the chair, which had already been included once. The lines of the frame of the mirror were added. All together an unusual drawing for me, one-handed, singular minimalist lines, but one that added to the diversity of responses in this third and final day.