Latest 3-dayer

February 8/10 2025 ........ in chronological order.........

Quote of the weekend from Natalie: " Bob always starts with his usual drawing and then surprises us with something amazing"

She said this as we gathered at the start of the third day, as Niel reviewed the work on the wall. She is right. I tend to start within my comfort zone with a pen in each hand, recording my initial responses and exploring the forms of the quick poses as they present themselves to me. Then over the three days I enter into a new world, which is unanticipated, not designed, unexpected, but often celebrated and relished by colleagues. 

As Niel claimed: "Bob has moved on"

So, the first four drawings below reveal no surprises. I've seen them before.

And then, a real attempt to move away from my parts approach, to engage with the whole.

I really enjoyed the process of making this drawing. First of all I love lying poses. I love the challenge of perspective. Yet above all I enjoy the exaggerated foreshortening and the advancing of the leg towards the viewer, with the rest of the body explained within and beyond the huge dimension of her lower left leg. This was quick drawing with my two hands exploring the forms, and resulting in a pleasing composition within the frame of my paper.

There then arose a very different approach. This next drawing started off with a toothbrush and a pot of charcoal powder. On the paper I brushed in the darker shaded tonal areas. So there were blurred blocks of charcoal but no precise lines at all to suggest the pose. I picked up a pen and a pencil and a few lines went in. Then a moistened brush softened the darker areas to suggest the anatomical forms. 

There then emerged a conversation about frames, together with my Hockney polaroid connection that when one looks at a pose, or a building, or a landscape, then one is not seeing the whole but one's eye is moving around and homing in on a part, then another, then another. The eye travels around focusing on one part after another. Now, each part can become a drawing in itself.

This next drawing contains a quick response to a series of short poses. Each, I believe tries to capture the essence of the pose. In each I tried to capture the principal of the gesture .

In the next drawing I am focusing a quarter of the pose in each frame. From slightly different viewpoints and drawn at different scales, but the four parts on the paper are juxtaposed in the correct spatial relationship, and when one stands back and views the drawing as a whole one can clearly make out the pose.

Here I am back to focussing in on one part of an overall pose within a frame, and responding to and attempting to convey the gesture: i.e. the weight from the leg as it presses on the toes, and the twist of the body.

This had a number of parts which then produced their own frames. At this point we stopped for lunch so it remains for me to return to it on a future occasion and develop the idea. I am looking forward to doing this. 

Here I am illustrating what Natalie was referring to. Something different. 

I have regularly claimed that during each 3-day session over at Niel Bally's in Talgarth, Powys, something new emerges to contribute to the continual evolution in my life-drawing journey. This is no exception.

In the first two drawing below I have set up a triptych of frames. From looking around one side of my paper on my easel I place into the drawing that part of the pose I am isolating (the lower legs). Then I moved my easel slightly and looked around the other side and place the head, arm and buttock. I then focussed on the central part of the pose which went in at a slightly different scale. Each part in its frame then moved over into the adjacent frame, and superimpositioning, overlap, and morphing took place. A result is lots of movement.

I had become fascinated by the challenge of drawing a face when looking down on it from above. So I took this challenge on at a large scale. The nose was the starting point and it was quite extraordinary how the lines of the forehead and the cheek kept moving around until they found their place (but this is exactly what takes place with a whole pose drawing, and eventually one reaches the right form and proportion. Having got the head to my satisfaction I then debated what to do in the remainder of the paper, and without too much thought there emeerged this lovely landscape of her tummy and beyond, slightly subdued in intensity of mark-making.

And finally for an hour or so at the end of day-3 something different again...............................

The thighs and tummy went in first - my first focus. Then I superimposed a breast. Then I superimposed the head. But wait a moment - there is a second breast which does not relate, spatially, to the first one. I am confused. Confused, because I am unable to recall my thinking at the time. Not surprising though....I am in a deep state of meditation, being taken over completely by the act of life-drawing, and the cognitive/perceptual depths of my process. This is a real therapy! Long may it continue!

Some thoughts on what is taking place.........

 ..........................within and during the cognitive perceptual world of my process.

A......I an sensitive to the content of the spatiality encompassing the artist and the model,

and I explore the pose and its parts within the spatiality within the paper.

B......I move back and forth between my subjective perception of the pose, and

an objective spatial organisation in the drawing. [I think I recall this is a variation on a concept from a Jenny Saville exhibition catalogue].

.C......my drawings hold a complexity of ambiguity and are open to interpretation.

D......I am critically aware that there is the drawing and the paper not drawn on.

E......my transformative process is one of figurative reconfiguring.

F......I deal simultaneously with figural concepts, i.e. form, shape, line, angle,

and with spatial concepts, i.e. position, orientation and relationships, such as in front of, beyond, above and below.

I will now enter the weekend of life-drawing with a greater understanding of my confusion.

Mark-making and more

Just been sorting through a stack of my drawings. Some I have retained for my 're-visiting' programme, some for drawing on the backs of next time, and others to go in to the recycling bin. The majority, about 120 are in the third category. 

During this process a particular type of drawing came back to grab my attention (three examples included below) which are focused very much on mark-making and particularly how I have utilised 

(i) a variety of weight of line, and 

(ii) a variety of tool. 

So fine-liner pen, soft graphite woodless pencil, dark (heavy) graphite woodless pencil, and charcoal caressed on the paper with the finger. 

And we see here that 'drawing technique' is very much to the fore, and is clear evidence that the architect within me is still very much up-and-running. Whilst it greatly pleases me that my draughtsmanship skills are evident I can also claim that they continue to evolve. 

It also pleases me that my developments in my draughting technique are fundamentally and systemically integrated and synthesised with 

a) composition within the page, 

b) gestural forms or better said 'forms with gesture', 

c) overlap and superimpositioning whilst enhancing transparency, 

d) an ambiguity, and an initial uncertainty as to what has taken place in the artist's perceptual and selection processes, 

e) a play between a straightforward figurative representation and the often unanticipated arrival and unexpected outcome of an abstract collage of parts, and finally 

f) other fundamental architectural issues to do with  'different scales', 'depth and perspective', 'focus points/areas', all held together and contributing to the overriding concept and qualities of 'spatiality' within a 'spatial composition'.

'

Katie

In a few days time I will be at Niel Bally's where the model will be Katie. Here are some of my earlier responses to her.

Also see my comments re Katie on my previous posting 'Untitled....as yet'

Untitled.... as yet.

Not sure of the issue which this post is to address. Usually I do have something to say, something to explore, something to celebrate. But nothing particular here., at the moment.

Perhaps I just simply wanted to post the two drawings I have been working on and off over the past two days.

Firstly, in connection with the next 3-day workshop at Niel Bally's over in Talgarth, Powys (February 8th-10th) where our model will be Katie, who I have drawn over a number of years. I love drawing her as like most of our models she has a real understanding of her role in the process which model and artist generate and then both creatively participate in. So I looked back through my responses to Katie and selected two A1 drawings of short quickie poses. Placing the two together to form a dancing group I got out my pastels and started playing, trying to decide how far to go in separately distinguishing between the figures. I did intend to control the tonal range, keeping things on the cool side. I made reference to some of Auguste Rodin's waterclour drawings which I have been studying following my request to a family member for a Christmas present [Auguste Rodin, Erotische Aquarelle, published by Schirmer/Mosel, 1995]. 

Prior to starting I place my thoughts in my note book: 

"dark, red or brown hair, contrasted with subdued 'quiet' colouring; perhaps - a blue plinth or green; transparency of applied colour essential in order to retain 'line'; subtle variation of colour/tone between different figures"

This work can be seen as part of my 'Revisiting Programme' and is number 53 in the series. The last one, Number 52, was posted three months ago on October 13 2024.

 53

The second drawing is one of those which, upon viewing it again after a break, I found most difficult to fathom out the original situation. It was clearly a compilation of parts of more than one pose, but how many? I initially though I located seven parts, but was unsure about this. So I compiled an analytical chart in my notebook (see below) and concluded there are six parts, which are likely to have appeared from six (quickie) poses. In the end it does not matter one iota, as the aim is now to a) identify each part and by choice of colour to give it a roll, and an identity, in the new composition, b) to pursue my 'Picabian' approach by maintaining transparency, spatiality and depth, through overlap, and c) whilst allowing the beholder to follow the original line drawing, transform the work into different genre.

 54

 

I could have written this yesterday

This from November 2015. So, we see that little changes...............

 "I am grappling with a number of issues currently, which find expression in these drawings: 

(i) seeking tonal variation through the use of line, 

(ii) foreshortening, aided by exaggerating that which is nearest, 

(iii) utilising soft or lost edges to help the focus on my selected area of interest, 

(iv) when presented with a pose, deciding quickly what it is that challenges, then starting to explore that interest on the paper. By this I mean that I instantly set in motion my perceptual-motor response mechanism. I look, I see, I feel. I then somehow transfer my feelings, through my hands, through my pencils, on to the paper. I then become immersed. I enter a meditative state. I then begin to respond to the marks that are appearing on the paper. From here on the drawing evolves: part sub-consciously, part consciously."

Economy of line

I'm starting the first morning of 2025 with a look back at a few of my minimalist responses. And recognising the fundamental part that line plays in helping us to see what we are looking at.

Roman amphitheatre in El Djem, Tunisia.

Cathedral at Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Wildebeest in Namibia (composed from a line of 14 as they walked in front of me).

Dangling foot from Extreme Poses in Stroud.

Water buffalo in Botswana.